Now we face a slightly more challenging task — determining the cardiac rhythm.
We have yet to study the most common types of arrhythmias, but first you must learn to distinguish sinus rhythm from “non-sinus rhythm”. This is one of the first questions you should ask yourself when interpreting an ECG. To do this, you need to memorize, write down (if necessary), or consult your reference sheet with the criteria of sinus rhythm.
Criteria for Sinus Rhythm
Let us review an example
In lead II are positive P waves of identical morphology,
located at a constant distance from the QRS complex in all consecutive cardiac cycles. The number of P waves equals the number of QRS complexes.
Heart rate 62 minute (1500/24 = 62,5). RR intervals are regular, or the variation between consecutive RR intervals does not exceed ±10% of the mean RR interval duration.
Thus, it can be concluded that this is a normal sinus rhythm. Let us consider another example.
In lead II are positive P waves of identical morphology, located at a constant distance from the QRS complex in all consecutive cardiac cycles. The number of P waves equals the number of QRS complexes.

The average heart rate calculated using 5 cardiac cycles is approximately 71 beats per minute. At first glance, this appears to be sinus rhythm. But what about rhythm regularity?
The difference between the longest and the shortest RR interval is 160 ms (940 vs 780 ms), corresponding to an RR variability of approximately 18.6%.
Thus, the final criterion is not fulfilled. Therefore, despite the sinus node being the pacemaker, the rhythm cannot be considered normal sinus rhythm. This represents sinus arrhythmia.
I would like to reassure those who had difficulty assessing rhythm regularity. First, we will review everything in practice, and second, you will not make a significant mistake if you ignore this variation. It is not the most critical error in ECG interpretation.
At this stage, we have covered enough for you to begin independently determining the rhythm at a basic level — “sinus” vs “non-sinus.”